Home | About Us | Archive | Documents | Campaigns & Issues | Links | Contact Us


      Oppose Canada's Renewal of the Military Training Mission to the Ukraine

      By David Rennie*

      The Hamilton Coalition to Stop the War wrote the following article, which was published by the Hamilton Spectator newspaper. Among other antiwar campaigns, the Hamilton Coalition to Stop the War is active in organizing against US and Canadian government support for the rightwing coup government in Ukraine, and against US and Canadian military involvement in Europe including within NATO. The below article is the basis for a petition campaign calling to oppose renewing Canada’s military training mission in Ukraine and calls for Canada to cut ties with NATO HERE

      Canada’s military mission to Ukraine expires in March. For several reasons, it shouldn’t be renewed.

      First, the present Ukrainian government, installed in a coup orchestrated by Washington, isn’t worthy of our support. According to the BBC, former US Assistant Secretary of State, Victoria Nuland, admitted that the U.S.A. spent $5 billion over a number of years to instigate regime change in Ukraine.(1) She overthrew the democraticallyelected Yanukovich government in 2014 which had less than one year remaining in its term of office and was trying to deal with competing pressures to take a financial bailout from either Russia, on the one hand, or the European Union, on the other. (2) On February 21, 2014, Yanukovich secured an agreement with European Union officials on EU economic assistance, sharing of power in Ukraine, and moving up Ukrainian elections. (3) The agreement was not good enough for US Senator John McCain and other key Democratic US policy-makers. After violent street protests, the US installed a prowestern junta, headed by billionaire Poroshenko.

      According to the CBC, the Harper government allowed the Canadian embassy in Kiev to shelter the violent street protesters for one week and one embassy staffer to use an embassy vehicle (later burned) to take part in the protests. (4) In other words, Canadian tax-payers supported US regime-change in Ukraine.

      Second, the agents of regime change recruited by Nuland were none other than gangs of thugs from several fascist parties, remnants of the very same U k r a i n i a n fascists allied to Hitler in WW2. They fought soldiers and police in the main squares of Kiev and other cities. Poroshenko’s coup government has the dubious distinction of being the only government in Europe with fascists in cabinet, several holding key security posts. Canadian veterans might be surprised to learn that the Trudeau government is considering renewing Canada’s military mission to a country with the same fascists in government that they fought in WW2.

      Third, the Ukrainian junta immediately implemented divisive policies, such as banning the use of the Russian language and some of the country’s most popular political parties. It seems logical that Crimea would have been less likely have voted overwhelmingly to leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia, and eastern Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine would have been much more hesitant to seek independence if a more moderate and tolerant government took office following constitutional procedures. War and economic decline could have been avoided as well. Ukraine, a former Soviet republic (and a province of Tsarist Russia for the previous two hundred years) could have sought peaceful relations and constructive economic engagement with both East and West and particularly the booming economic “silk road” trade deals with China. Instead, seeking EU and NATO membership, while implementing draconian austerity policies, have only brought Ukraine to the point of economic and social collapse.

      A fourth reason is the reaction of the Ukrainian government to the brutal Odessa massacre of May 2, 2014. On that day, over 40 peaceful antigovernment protesters were killed and some 200 injured when pro-government thugs set fire to the Trade Union House in which they had taken shelter. This incident has not been properly investigated and no culprits arrested or punished.

      Finally, contrary to the promises made to the last Soviet president, Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO expansion continued to the east, along with a continuing military build-up, missile installations, and war games right up to Russia’s borders. It’s completely understandable why Russians feel encircled by NATO, especially now with the possibility of Ukrainian membership. We should remember that Russia was invaded twice in the twentieth century from the West costing tens of millions of Russian lives and huge devastation. A major war, possibly WW3, could develop from aggressive NATO expansion along the Russian frontier. Placing Canadian soldiers there makes no sense at all.

      It’s time that the Trudeau government broke with aggressive Harper-era policies and dealt fairly and diplomatically with the Russian Federation. For this reason, it would be far wiser for the Trudeau government not to extend the military mission to Ukraine and to pull its troops and equipment out of all the frontier states with Russia. Indeed, Canadians would benefit from cutting ties with NATO altogether and pursuing instead a peaceful, humane, and independent foreign policy.

      * David Rennie writes on behalf of the Hamilton Coalition to Stop the War.
      www.hamiltoncoalitiontostopthewar.ca



      Back to Article Listing